SadButMadLad's Blog

Just another blog complaining about anything and everything

Disable the tube

Inspired by this post by Underdog  and Jody’s calls to have the whole tube network modified for him and others like him.

He doesn’t take into account any cost benefit analysis. Only that everything must be modified for the disabled no matter what the cost to the public purse even in this strained times. Not public not private, they don’t expect to pay a dicky bird towards the modifications they demand.

It would be cheaper if people like Jody had free taxis everywhere they go than modify the tube network.

All this modification for disabled is fine, but sometimes it doesn’t make much difference anyway.

For instance building regulations means that you have to have a downstairs loo in a new house with a wide door to allow a wheelchair access amongst many other rules. How many households have wheelchair visitors? Very very few. How many households have wheelchair occupants? Even less. How many new houses are being built compared to the overall housing stock? A tiny proportion. So the likeyhood of a disabled person being able make use of the downstairs look is extremely small.

It would be cheaper to remove all the legislation about disabled access from building control and fund the odd conversion where necessary totally from public funds. All disabled people will have very individual needs so it would be better to make their house totally suited to their particular needs than make all new houses just about ok for the disabled and not suitable for the minority disabled who have exceptional needs and then have even more changes made to the house for them.

Advertisements

Written by sbml

December 18, 2010 at 20:51

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. “It would be cheaper if people like Jody had free taxis everywhere they go than modify the tube network.”

    That would suit 99% of disabled people down to the ground.

    But not that one per cent that Jody falls into – that wouldn’t be good enough for them, because their objections are ideological, not practical.

    They want, in effect, to ignore reality. Accepting that there are things they cannot do is anathema, and must be someone else’s ‘fault’.

    JuliaM

    December 19, 2010 at 07:42


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: